Tonight, Tuesday, 15 June, 2010, @ 9:00pm. I will be on The Rick Amato Show with USTREAM TV!  Don’t miss it!

http://www.USTREAM.tv

http://den-a.plr.liquidcompass.net/player/flash/audio_player.php?id=KCBQAM&uid=149

or on KCBQ 1170am radio in San Diego County!!

Appointed Sheriff William D. Gore steps in it again!  Do NOT miss this story.  Google William D. Gore & Ruby Ridge then Google William D. Gore & 9/11.  See for yourself beofre you vote.  Then, Google me!  The choice will be clear; vote Jay La Suer for Sheriff, San Diego County.

Numerous inconsistencies in Sheriff Gore’s account regarding his FBI exploits

June 7, 8:04 AMSan Diego County Political Buzz ExaminerKimberly Dvorak

ShareThis

Sheriff William Gore

File

If you like this …

Freedom of Information Act gleans erroneous data regarding Military LRADs at town hall

Military LRAD devices placed at San Diego town halls come under fire

Second Amendment lawsuit takes aim at SD Sheriff Gore

San Diego Sheriff’s Department in need of change

Not exactly a shoot out at the ok coral, but close

View all »

In a stunning turn of events, just days before the California primary, Sheriff Gore appears to have embellished his FBI exploits. Statements like “I stormed hijacked planes, I did all that stuff,” could have been exaggerated and needs further explanation.

The emotional aspects of the San Diego County Sheriff’s race may have caused Gore, the current appointed caretaker of the Sheriff’s office, to misspeak or embellish his background as an agent with the FBI.

After dozens of phone calls to verify Sheriff Gore’s days as a young G-man in the FBI storming hijacked planes and killing bank robbers it seems it is Gore who has some explaining to do. According to multiple news stories Sheriff Gore talked about his high flying days in the FBI in order to shrug off complaints from San Diego Sheriff Opponents Jim Duffy and Jay LaSuer about his lack of street experience. This game of one-upmanship have led to more questions than answers

In several recent print articles published in San Diego County, Sheriff Gore is reported to have offered specific details, regarding his background in law enforcement, which in turn caused questions to be asked by many who found inconsistencies in the facts contained in the articles. And when contacted there were no requests from Gore to correct the obvious inaccuracies in the articles. In the East County Magazine story an email was sent from the Sheriff’s Dept. thanking them for a good story, said Miriam Raftery.

Those asking questions about Sheriff Gore’s comments about his background were concerned that he may have embellished details regarding his involvement in two incidents- a 1972 hijacking in Seattle and a bank robbery in 1978.

Once the details of the background check unfolded, dates did not match up. In the published articles, Sheriff Gore related his involvement in a 1978 bank robbery and a 1975 hijacking incident both of which occurred in Washington State.

Sheriff Gore says he stands by his record as a FBI agent and has no reason to lie about the details to prove anything to the Sheriff candidates Duffy and LaSuer.

(Links to the stories; East County Magazine- http://www.eastcountymagazine.org/node/1865, San Diego Tribune- http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/may/16/sheriffs-campaign-brings-out-macho-side/, and Voice of San Diego- http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/government/article_974ac536-62e8-11df-b754-001cc4c03286.html)

When questioned and asked for specific details regarding his involvement in the incidents, Sheriff Gore began to validate his involvement by explaining that the hijacking incident actually occurred in 1973 rather than the 1975 as reported, and then proceeded to provide news reports. Both the 1973 and 1975 dates were wrong and the hijacking actually took place in August of 1972 according to the Seattle Times article provided by Gore. Further research pointed to the agents involved in the hijacking as Special Agent Dave Maples and Philip R. Miller from the Portland FBI office and they were driven to the aircraft by S.A. Martin, according to the book Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI.

When Gore was asked about the incidents in question, he was combative and claimed to not remember specific dates and questioned this reporter as to why a fact check was even needed. However, numerous discrepancies contained in San Diego news articles made it clear fact checking was necessary.

Gore described the hijacking event vividly with Raftery of East County Magazine.

“I helped stop a plane hijacking in 1975 (actually 1972). I was in a chase car under the plane (not how agents who boarded the aircraft recall the event), which had landed in Seattle. We came up with a plan to storm the plane…We convinced the hijacker he needed to put a new crew on the plane (the hijacker Frank Markoe Sibley requested a new crew with experience flying across the ocean). We sent in an FBI agent who had flown military planes (actually two FBI agents boarded the aircraft both with flight experience) and thought he could bluff his way through, but we didn’t know the hijacker had been a commercial pilot. He started quizzing our guy about specs of a 727 and realized he was faking…He made them [the agents] strip down,” Gore described.

“Our man had a gun in the lining of his jacket and he managed to toss it down to us (there is no mention of this). The hijacker handcuffed our agents in the front, instead of behind their backs, big mistake. He put him up in the pilot’s seat. Our agent dropped a Styrofoam cup or something pre-arranged…We raised up the gun on a pole and we were waiting to storm the doors…Sure as hell: boom, boom, boom! Our agent managed to shoot the hijacker and no one on board got hurt.”

“Then we went back in the terminal. There were 400 people there. To get a hero’s welcome was definitely a high for a 29-year-old agent (except to make this story plausible and accurate Gore would have to be 25 as he was born on July 11, 1947).”

The press contact for the Seattle SeaTac Airport, Perry Cooper (no relation to DB Cooper he says), searched for details on Gore and came up empty handed. Longtime newsman and purveyor of Seattle news, Chris Ingalls of NBC’s King 5 also checked into the story without any luck.

Seattle’s most infamous hijacking is the DB Cooper case, Cooper stole $200,000 and jumped out of the plane never to be found his case remains open in the FBI to this day.

When the FBI was contacted about the airplane hijacking, Seattle agent Fred Gutt (goot) said the agency doesn’t discuss current or retired employees with the media. However, the easiest way to confirm the story would be with the FBI report regarding the hijacking, but according to several law enforcement agencies the FBI is reluctant to work with any other agencies and is by far the most secretive operation in the United States.

Another event in the Seattle region that Gore spoke about was a bank robbery in which he claims to have shot and killed the robber as he fled the scene of the crime. Police records regarding the August 24, 1978 robbery indicate the event took place and the bank robber was killed by FBI agents. Three FBI agents’ names are in the police report; Gore is not one of them.

This is how Gore remembers the bank heist in Bremerton, Washington.

“It’s not like TV. When you take somebody’s life, it stays with you. That was in 1978. I was in a shoot-out with a bank robber in Seattle. He had a pistol. I had a shotgun…We had a tip that the bank was going to be robbed. I was outside and my wife who was an FBI agent—actually we were engaged back then–was inside, posing as a teller. All she heard was two shots fired outside. There were some tense moments, but the good guy won,” Gore told East County Magazine.

Similar recounts of the events appeared in the Voices of San Diego and the San Diego Union Tribune and it is worth pointing out that the Tribune has endorsed Sheriff Gore’s quest to continue on as Sheriff.

Gore’s academic, military and law enforcement record is certainly impressive. He finished his undergraduate work at the University of San Diego in 1969 and somehow picked up a masters at Seattle University, completed basic navel officer military training, finished a 20-week FBI training and serve in Kansas City FBI office all before the 1972 hijacking.

Something has to give. Plus, Gore is reported to have said he was 29 at the time of the hijacking, but he was at least 24/25 which would have made him a newly-minted FBI agent and it’s highly unlikely the FBI would let him plan and storm a high-profile hijacking case, according to law enforcement agents.

San Diego Sheriff Deputy and contender for Gore’s office, Jim Duffy says he is not critic of Gore’s FBI experience, but it’s his lack of California Penal code experience. “He has never arrested anybody and he recently spoke about arresting speeders and it’s unlawful for law enforcement to arrest speeders. He simply lacks the basic fundamentals of California law,” says Duffy. “This is where he falls short and it makes him unsuited for the Sheriff job.”

Gore’s other Sheriff Opponent, Jay LaSuer says, “If these embellishments are true he (Gore) has tarnished the badge of every law enforcement officer in this county.”

It looks like the voters have a tough decision in front of them tomorrow.

For more stories; http://www.examiner.com/x-10317-San-Diego-County-Political-Buzz-Examiner

Listen in Live this morning to my Election Day Interview with Rick Roberts on KFMB, 760am at 7:35am.  Don’t Miss It!  BREAKING NEWS~

http://www.760kfmb.com/Global/category.asp?C=149757

This covers about 550,000 homes in SD county.

Cox is the biggest cable provider in SD county.

http://www.jamesllambert.com/nightlightstv.html

www.YouTube.com/JayLaSuer

Endorsements from Grand Ol’ Patriot Trumpeter are not given just to endorse a candidate and fill a seat, they are given to True Conservatives that deserve the support and energy to get them elected from Grassroot Patriots across this state.

This endorsement means that your campaign has resonated with voters in your district and we will hold your leadership at a higher standard because you now have Grassroot support which will be known across the state. This also means that if you are elected we will be remain active in your district after voting day, so make sure your campaign promises are ones you can keep.

The Silent Majority is no longer silent and we have chosen you to help us Reclaim America.

(*More endorsements to come. Some unopposed races will not be endorsed until after primaries)

Amanda Morello
Developer, Grand Ol’ Patriot Trumpeter
http://goptrumpeter.com

WHO IS APPOINTED SHERIFF BILL GORE?

9/11

A June 9, 2005 article in The San Diego Union-Tribune, stated that the FBI failed to seize at least 5 opportunities to intercept two 9/11 hijackers before the attacks, including two instances in San Diego County when the terrorists lived with an FBI informant and were befriended by a subject of a previous FBI investigation.

According to a report released by the Justice Department’s Inspector General, the FBI office in San Diego erred by focusing too much on drug investigations before Sept. 11, 2001.

Despite the fact that FBI headquarters had established counter terrorism as a top priority of the FBI in 1998, the San Diego field office was continuing to pursue drug trafficking as its top priority in 2001, the report stated.

The hijackers did not draw attention to themselves while in San Diego. They used the same names known to the intelligence community for all purposes.

One of the terrorist’s names was published in the telephone book!

Another serious FBI breakdown was the agency’s mishandling of a Phoenix FBI agent’s memo two months before 9/11 that outlined the potential for Osama bin Laden to send students to enroll in flight school in preparation for attacking civil aviation targets.

Two of the hijackers on board the airliner that crashed into the Pentagon trained in San Diego.

Mr. Gore was the FBI Special Agent in charge at the San Diego FBI office during this period of time!

This same person, Bill Gore, wants to be the Sheriff in this county.
——————————————————————————————-

RUBY RIDGE, IDAHO

In August 1992, three people died at a place known as Ruby Ridge, Idaho. Mr. Gore was the Special Agent in Charge at Seattle and was part of the command structure at Ruby Ridge when the FBI command structure changed the Rules of Engagement for the FBI (operating at Ruby Ridge) to basically a “Shoot on Sight” policy. The FBI was attempting to arrest Randy Weaver on a weapons violation charged in a warrant of arrest.

The FBI shooting policy in effect in August 1992 provided: “Agents are not to utilize deadly force against any person except as necessary in self defense or for the defense of another when they have reason to believe that they or another are in serious danger of death or grievous bodily harm. Where feasible a verbal warning should be given before deadly force is applied.”

The rules were changed as follows:
a. “If any adult male in the compound is observed with a weapon prior to the (surrender) announcement, deadly force can and should be employed, if the shot can be taken without endangering any children.”

b. “If any adult in the compound is observed with a weapon after the surrender announcement is made, and is not attempting to surrender, deadly force can and should be employed to neutralize the individual.”

As a result, Vickie Weaver was shot and killed while standing behind the front door of the cabin. She was not holding a gun, she was holding her baby!

News articles report that he (Gore) believed that “Any armed adult (who) emerged from the cabin… would be displaying clear disregard for the lawful demand to lay down arms and surrender.”

He believed that the Rules of Engagement seemed appropriate for the situation at Ruby Ridge. He understood that the Rules made any adult male with a weapon in the Weaver compound the subject of deadly force….

Regardless of whether or not they were a threat.

Mr. Gore never questioned or challenged the policy change or the rest of the leadership team regarding the potential for the unwarranted and unnecessary death of any person who was not a direct threat.

In a CNN report posted on the web on October 14, 1995, the following is stated: “FBI Swat team members told a Senate panel Friday that they were shocked by the “shoot-on-sight” rules in effect during the FBI’s 11 day siege of white separatist Randy Weaver’s cabin in 1992”
“My reaction is ‘you’ve got to be kidding.” agent Donald Kusulas told the committee.

Agent Peter King said that his reaction was “that’s crazy; that’s ridiculous.” and both men testified that they decided not to follow rules which allowed them to shoot on sight at any armed, adult male at the scene.

The U.S. Senate Sub-Committee investigating the events at Ruby Ridge, in their official report, stated, “Ruby Ridge represents a tragic chapter in the history of American law enforcement. The American people expect more and deserve more. If our government is to maintain – indeed, even deserve the trust of the American people, it cannot fear or avoid the truth.”

The 9th District Court said that the shooting policy was a gross deviation from constitutional principles and a wholly unwarranted return to a lawless and arbitrary wild-west school of law enforcement.

The U.S. Senate Sub-Committee, in their official report, stated “Rules of Engagement cannot eliminate constitutional rights with regard to certain suspects, even if they are particularly dangerous.”

Mr. Gore, when called to testify before the U.S. Senate Sub-Committee investigating the Ruby Ridge incident, used his 5th Amendment right against self incrimination and refused to testify.

——————————————————————————————-

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

RUBY RIDGE: Report of the subcommittee on terrorism, technology and government – information of the senate committee on the judiciary.
Seattle Post-Intelligencer – September 20, 1995 – Headline: $ FBI Agents take the 5th at Ruby Ridge Hearing.
The Washington Post, September 20, 1995 – Headline: Siege Leader says he was tossed to ‘Sharks’; Demoted FBI Official indicates role of superiors in Ruby Ridge has been glossed over.
Associated Press – September 19, 1995 – Headline: FBI Field commander says he is scapegoat
#444 Civil Suit settled in Ruby Ridge case – Department of justice press release – August 15, 1995
CNN U.S. News October 14, 1995 Web posted at 8:56 a.m. EDT Headline: SWAT team members: FBI shooter rules “crazy” at Ruby Ridge
Federal News Service, September 19, 1995 Headline: Hearing on the senate judiciary committee on terrorism, technology and government information subcommittee SUBJECT: Federal raid in Ruby Ridge, Idaho
The Tech Online edition, September 26, 1997 Headline: Court says ‘Shoot to Kill’ practice used by FBI at Ruby Ridge unlawful
The 9/11 Commission Report – Final report of the national commission on terrorist attacks upon the United States
Sign on San Diego June 9, 2005 Headline: Local FBI faulted for pre-9/11 errors

Thanks for your support guys!

In order to put my name on the June, 2010 ballot, I must pay a filing fee of $2,185.04.  Over the next seven weeks, I need to gather 8,741 signatures for a” Petition in Lieu of Filing Fee.”   By getting these signatures, I do not have to spend your donated campaign dollars on a San Diego County Filing Fee!  This is what I call Fiscal Responsibility.  I would be honored if you would help by signing this “petition in lieu of filing fee,“ and then gather signatures from your family and friends.  Please email Volunteers@SheriffJay.org, give your name, how many petitions you would like & mailing address.  We will send you a petition/s.

There is another way you can help! Any registered voter in San Diego County may sign a Petition in Lieu of Filing Fee.  You can help by asking your friends, contacts, associates to sign too.  In order to circulate this petition, you must be registered to vote in San Diego County.  This is a non-partisan race, so it does not matter what you or the signer’s Party is.  Simply fill the petitions, then fill out the short form on the back of each petition.  When completed, drop them into the mail to the campaign address below.  Or…

Looking for another way to join Team Sheriff Jay?  On Thursday, 18 February, 2010, I and my Campaign Team will be at the Scottish Rite Center (Mission Valley), in the Parking Lot (under the canopies).  Come on by & drop off your completed petitions from 4-7:00pm.  We will have “Sheriff Jay” bumper stickers, t-shirts and yard signs available too!  Just drive thru and sign a petition or drop off your petitions.  How about parking, grab a cup of hot apple cider, introduce yourself, and join the Team!  Jumpin’ Jack Flash will be there playing some great tunes too! Come on down!

If you are unable to make the “Drive Thru Signature Drive” event, simply drop your completed petitions into the mail, addressed to:

“Sheriff Jay”

P O Box 2115

La Mesa, CA 91943-2115

If you find you have too many petitions to mail and cannot make it by the event, call me at 619-341-2010 and my Volunteer Coordinator will drop by and pick them up!   My campaign is a very, very strong, grassroots effort and our numbers larger every day.  Together, we will change San Diego County for the better, for a safer tomorrow.

Thanks so much for your help, and I look forward to seeing you on the road to VICTORY,

Jay

Simply visit: https://www.sheriffjay.org/donate.shtml and join my CAMPAIGN for SHERIFF, San Diego County Team! Or  send your donation to: ” Sheriff Jay” P O Box 2115 La Mesa, CA 91943.

Together, we can bring true change to San Diego, and make our County a Safer Place to live and raise our families. Any amount is welcome and I appreciate every penny! Please do not hesitate to contact me at 619.341.2010 with any questions , or here on Facebook, at your earliest convenience and again, I appreciate your support!!! I can also be reached via email at Jay@SheriffJay.org (I believe in an “Open Door Policy” and welcome communication ALWAYS!).

Jay La Suer, ONE TOUGH SHERIFF, 2010!!!

It gives me great pleasure to endorse the candidacy of Jay La Suer for San Diego County Sheriff. Jay is a professional lawman who knows and understands law enforcement. More importantly however, Jay
La Suer knows the duties of the sheriff to stand for liberty and the importance of keeping his oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. The people of San Diego are lucky to have such a man to elect as their sheriff.
Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret)

Jay La Suer- THIS IS LEADERSHIP.

San Diego Sheriff candidate- and former Chief of Staff for republican Ron Roberts- JIM DUFFY appeared as a guest on my show last night and dropped what some may call a bombshell.

When asked if he would position himself “to the left or to the right of opponent Bill Gore” Duffy said:

“Definitely to the left of Bill Gore. In fact I will be to the left of all other candidates”.

When asked to give examples on which issues he will be on the left, none were offered.

Interestingly, Duffy supports permits for concealed weapons and using the local Sheriff’s department to enforce federal illegal immigration law.

There are many other elected officials who act as though they believe only they are trustworthy and law abiding citizens; that law abiding citizens must look to them for their quality of life and their protection from violence. In other words, these elected officials do not trust those law abiding citizens, the very people who built this nation, and whose sons, daughters, husbands and wives have served in our armed forces to guarantee the freedoms and rights our founding fathers intended for all citizens, past, present and future to hold and enjoy.

Law enforcement will admit that even if a law enforcement officer was assigned to every city block and every rural area, they could not guarantee the safety of those they are sworn to protect and serve.

Currently, 40 states have “Right to Carry” laws (RTC) and 36 states have “Shall Issue” laws pertaining to the right of their law abiding citizens to have Concealed Carry Permits (CCW). Many predicted enactment of such laws would cause violence and crime to soar. This has not been the case. States where “Shall Issue” laws exist follow certain criteria which must be met prior to issuing such permits. Persons not eligible for the license include, but are not limited to the following:

Convicted felons.
Persons who have had restraining orders issued against them.
Minors.
Persons with mental illness and/or psychological problems that would prohibit them from functioning without medication.
Persons who have been convicted of the manufacture, sales or distribution of illegal substance(s).
Those who have a history of numerous encounters with law enforcement.
Plus a few others.

Those who; apply for a concealed carry permit must demonstrate a thorough knowledge of the laws pertaining to the use of lethal force and competency with their firearm. And, they must pass a law enforcement background check to verify the statements contained within their application.

Once the above criteria have been met, the applicant must be issued the permit. The issuance is based on these criteria and these criteria only, not on the whim of some bureaucrat. There are also rules which must be adhered to by those persons who have qualified for and obtained a CCW permit. For example, if a person who has been issued a CCW permit is arrested and convicted for driving under the influence (DUI), that persons permit, is immediately revoked.

Many “Politically Correct” officials will raise the shrill alarm that such action is nothing less than creating an armed camp in our neighborhoods. But historically this is an untrue belief with no basis in fact.

I believe we should glean the knowledge and experience from the thirty-six states with “Shall Issue’ laws and follow suit. The history of the thirty-six “Shall Issue” states proves that issuance of CCW permits helps protect citizens and actually prevents crime. In my over thirty years of law enforcement experience, I have encountered many individuals with concealed carry permits. I have never had a bad experience with any of these citizens. I have, however, arrested numerous criminals illegally carrying concealed firearms. None of the criminals would have been eligible to legally carry a concealed firearm – their only purpose was to prey on law abiding citizens who had not been granted the right to carry a concealed firearm.